Home Biography Metempsyche Blog Bibliophilia Random & Fan Contact

February 11, 2010

When Your Failboat Hits the Blogging Iceberg

At this very moment, I am doing A Very Scary Thing.

I am writing a blog entry.

“Why is that scary?” you might ask.  “You write every day!  You Tweet!  You comment on LiveJournal!”

“That’s different,” I might respond.  “That is responding to someone.  I know there’s a person on the other end reading my words, and I know I don’t sound totally stupid.  Or… if I do, it’s only 140 characters of teh dumb.”

I think my phobia of blogging stems from three distinct stimuli:

1.  I really loved Meg Cabot’s blog in high school.

2.  I was a geek in first grade.

3.  Blog entries, other than Book Bloggers Get Blogged, are about myself and not about a friend, acquaintance, or fictional character.

When I was sixteen, I thought Meg Cabot was the coolest, funniest, savviest, most insightful person alive.  I mean, let’s face it, she still is.  All-American Girl and Princess in Love still make me laugh out loud every time I read them, and that really speaks to their lasting humor, considering how often I reread books.

I think what I admired — and still admire, and now envy — most about Meg’s blogging is her way of making her own life read like a hilarious, engaging story.  I have that ability in person, I think… I hope… maybe… but I psych myself out when it comes to blogging.  I get great blog ideas in the shower every day (as a Digital Age baby is wont to do) and I open up Wordpress and look at the blank textbox and freeze up.

November 2006

I am once again setting myself the goal of blogging more like Meg Cabot. Or, actually, more like the Princess Diaries books. Maybe it will help me to develop talent for writing. Or at least give me some material about which to crappily write. Whichever.

Although I’ve gotta say, in general, I find people who blog about “What happened to me today” to be completely ridiculous, because, I hate to tell them, people generally really don’t care about what you did today. Like my roommate, for instance, who updates her Livejournal about four times a day and writes about how she… sat at her desk, writing on LJ.

Four years later, I still think that’s true, and that is the reason for my Blog Stimuli #1: Meg Cabot Is Cool.  When she blogs about her day, she’s able to make me care and laugh and envy and think.  Of course, part of that stems from the fact that her days seem to be pretty fascinating — she gets to wear a tiara, for pete’s sake!  She knows Judy Blume!  She gets TV channels!

I realize that many blogs’ format is to include aspects of daily life along with a hook (and Meg’s hook is simply, “I Am Meg Cabot”), but… I don’t know.  Even blogs that I find fascinating have some sort of hook, a reason why I pay attention — and it’s rarely the actual blog portion.

Foodblogs?

I like the pictures. Food is really pretty, especially macarons, which are the benchmark of a good foodblog.

Sleep Talkin’ Man?

…Does anyone read the little italics after what Man has Sleep-Talked?   I don’t.  I just read the bits about how kittens have TOO MANY WHISKERS, TOO MANY WHISKERS!

The authors whose blogs I enjoy intimidate me for a different reason, however.  They are more closely related to my Blog Phobia Stimuli #2: I Was A Geek In First Grade.

Actually, to be more honest, I was a geek from age one onward.  But first grade is really the impetus of my blogosphereophobia.  (It’s a real word.  It is.  Swear.)

In first grade, my elementary school hired a Music Appreciation teacher who seemed to completely miss the part of her teacher certification in which she should have been informed that first graders are six years old, do not generally have musical training, and listen to things like Mary-Kate & Ashley’s Brother For Sale or I, Grover.  Sometime in October, she gave us the assignment of writing an original Christmas carol.

Because we totally knew how to compose music.

Because we were absolutely not six years old.

So I went home and I worked and I worked and I wrote out some lyrics about ornaments, and I brought my song to school.

Every time I sit down to write a blog entry, I feel like I’m wearing my pink leggings and sitting on the too-big piano bench, being made to try to play the piano and sing an original Christmas carol in front of my pantsuit-clad, spiral-permed music teacher and twenty-two other kids who already tease me every day.

The teacher started laughing halfway through the first verse of my song and told me I was murdering her piano, which really should have been expected as I had never touched one before in my entire life, but the worst part was not the teacher belittling me.  It was the reactions of my classmates.  Three or four kids laughed at me back, but most everyone else just sat on the floor, watching the glowing lights in their Lite-Up shoes.  On the one hand, it’s awesome that probably no one else remembers the moment of my mortification, but on the other, it would have been really nice to have just one kid stand up and say, “Hey!  You never taught us piano, lady!  You can’t laugh at us for not knowing how to play!”

This would never have happened in a first grade Music Appreciation classroom, but it’s the emotion that counts.  My fear of blogging is less about sounding stupid and boring, and more about not sounding like anything at all.

That feeling is what segues into Blogosphereophobia Stimuli #3: I Am Not A Fictional Character.

I love writing about fictional characters.

I would hope that this is somewhat obvious, at this point.

Ever since I discovered that I was allowed to create my own characters, it’s been my passion, but more than that, it’s the discovery of someone else’s life, motivations, and experiences that fascinates me.  It’s why I studied History, Journalism, and Creative Writing in college.  It’s why I enjoyed interviewing popstars for Tommy2.net and why I liked transcribing long, rambling recollections of WWII vets for PBS.  Listening to the conversations around me was my favorite part of being a barista in New York City, and the one part of being a college admission counselor that really suited me was speaking one-on-one with really great, interesting prospective students.

But I already know me!

So, to make my Blogosphereophobia less severe, tell me: Who are you?  What do you like reading blogs about?  How did you stumble across my little blog, and what do you want to know about me?

  • Share/Bookmark

December 31, 2009

Countdowns of 2009: The Best Blog/Diary/Journal Entries of the Decade

Let’s party like it’s ten years ago today!

My Favorite Blog/Diary/Journal Entries of the Decade

* Names have been changed to protect the not-so-innocent.

99% of these probably don’t make sense to anyone, even the other people who were there.  A few of them barely still make sense to me.  I think that’s the sign of a decade well-lived, don’t you?

June 12, 2000

(2009 Note: This is a clear example of why not to write comics with your friends, about your friends, that only your friends could understand.)

The Fighting Fitzpeople

July 4, 2001

The most EMBARRASSING thing that ever happened to me…..

THE MOST embarrassing thing that EVER happened to me was, well, see, one day, the clasp on my bra broke and so my mom brought me another one, and I put the broken bra into a bag in my binder.  2 Weeks later, Eugene stole the bag out of my binder and left it in the Spanish room.  Chris M. found it, waved it around, and Sra. L. HUNG IT IN THE DOORWAY w/ a sign that said “¿De quien es esta bra?”  So I made a sign the next day that said “Don’t go through others’ binders (Eugene!)” so Ann made a sign that said “Don’t leave your bra in the Spanish Room (HAYLEY!!!)”

December 26, 2002

Amy and my BRILLIANT theory to the world of Harry Potter… it was actually MY theory, but I’m letting her share the credit.

Our idea as to why Voldemort wanted to kill Harry and James Potter is as follows:

According to a theory on Mugglenet.com (and our own slightly slow common sense), Harry and James were both heirs to Gryffindor – they lived in Godric’s hollow, and Harry succeeded in pulling Gryffindor’s sword out of the Sorting Hat during his battle with the Basilisk, the monster of Slytherin. Voldemort, knowing this and being the heir to Slytherin, targeted them because he wanted to finish Salazar’s work and end the quibble that had arisen between the two Hogwarts founders.

To further confuse you, Neville is a parallel to Peter Pettigrew, as they both were tag-alongs to three more popular and powerful wizards in their year.

Ginny is a parallel to Lily, because they both have red hair and are at nature good people and physically beautiful.

Since Neville is a parallel to Pettigrew, and has shown interest in Ginny, who is in turn parallel to Lily, we think that Pettigrew was attracted to Lily.

Voldemort, knowing that Pettigrew had lusted for Lily, and had had his heart broken when James married her, got Pettigrew to unleash his hidden wrath towards James by betraying James and Harry’s whereabouts to Voldemort.

We know that Voldemort did not have any interest in murdering Lily until she got in the way of him killing Harry. He even told her, “Stand aside, silly girl!” Therefore, we know that he, being the heir of Slytherin, was only after the heirs of Gryffindor – James and Harry – and not Lily, who was just Lily.

So that is our theory as to why Voldemort wanted to murder Harry and James Potter.

teehee, gigglegiggle. bahahahahahahaa.

WE ARE BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!!!!

KTODSPAF,

<3Hayley

August 5, 2003

This was the best night of my life.

August 3, 2004

6 Girls
+ 7 Boys
+ 10,000 Marshmallows
+ 10 Sidewalk Chalks
+ 2 Cars
+ 1 Policeman
+ 1 Creepy Whisper
+ Midnight
__________________
One Crazy, Crazy Night

November 1, 2005

My new goal is to try and blog more like Meg Cabot, who somehow always has enough to say that it takes her a lot of words.

Sometimes, I am very daunted by words. I’m always afraid that somehow, I will run out of them, and then I won’t have anything to do with my life. I go to the library or a bookstore, and I see all of the books there, and I think…

Holy crap.  Look how many words have been used up.

It just doesn’t seem like there are that many more combinations of them that are possible.

And whenever I read something absolutely wonderful, like the ( tropopause monologue ) of Angels in America, I think, “That combination of words is so breathtaking… and no one can ever use it again and claim it their own. There are so few breathtaking combinations of words that can be mine.”

I get paranoid about everything I write after that, because a) WHAT IF I INADVERTANTLY COPIED SOMEONE ELSE’S ENTIRE BOOK? and b) WHAT IF SOMEONE ELSE PUBLISHES MY COMBINATIONS OF WORDS BEFORE I GET THE CHANCE TO, AND THEN NO ONE WILL BELIEVE THEY’RE MINE?

Then I hate words for a few minutes, and try to get by without them. But thinking without words is difficult sometimes, and if someone comes in, communicating without words can be awkward.

It is a dilemma.

August 25, 2006

Dear Veronica Mars,

I have been watching your show far too much on YouTube. Can you teach me how to solve mysteries? I lose stuff a lot.

Sincerely,
Hayley

December 25, 2007

Best. Christmas. Ever.

The moral of the story is, if you’re two years old and you get a Barbie fork stuck so far up your nose that X-rays can’t find it (and they try to drug-test your mother because it’s 1989 and you accidentally told them it was a spoon up your nose and they assume you got the idea from watching your mother snort blow, when really it was a fork all along and your mother did no such thing!) and you eventually sneeze it out all over your poor harassed mother at dinner and it almost breaks your neck because your dad is holding your head in place; and then you refuse to talk about it for almost a week before very seriously telling your father, “I did it because there was a booger I couldn’t reach”… then you’ll laugh about it until you’re bawling eighteen years later.

Not that I ever got a fork stuck up my nose when I was two.

My Barbies still aren’t allowed to eat dinner.

December 23, 2008

I saw the Rockefeller Center tree, and watched the skaters circle round and round the golden-lit rink.

I was ignored in Gucci (again) but didn’t have to suffer through being called fat by Swedish Prada models in Bergdorf’s (although yesterday, Lily Cole called me ‘quite cool’ and asked where was ‘the queue to the wash-up’).

FAO Schwartz’ giant stuffed animals were everything I ever hoped they would be.  There was a duo of siblings in matching Fair Isles Christmas sweaters jumping around on the giant piano, and they were precious.

AT FAO SCHWARTZ YOU CAN HAVE MADE YOUR OWN CUSTOM MUPPET.  If I am ever rich, I will have my own fleet of Muppets.  That is, now that I know it is possible, the epitome of all my life’s dreams.  Fleet of custom Muppets.

I had dessert at the Plaza.  It was so beautiful it was almost scary, and there is no portrait of Eloise on the wall anymore, just a case of 2004-rerelease Eloise memorabilia for sale in the side lobby.  The waitstaff all wear tuxedos with tails and have cufflinks.  Dessert was served with literal silver spoons, despite the fact that I clearly was not born with one in my mouth.  The chocolate pot de creme with chantilly cream and chocolate streusel was divine, and it was free, because a middle-aged Armenian man who was too mild-mannered to Richard-Gere-in-Pretty-Woman himself out more than to order us French fries surreptitiously, which he sent back when we didn’t want them, paid for it.

I used the strategy I learned for such occasions on Long Island: ”Thank you,” and leave immediately.

The lights on the ironwork were almost enough to make me wish I were rich enough or self-deprecating enough to stay at the Plaza for Christmas, though.

And if I did, I would completely pour a pitcher of water down the mail chute.

March 23, 2009
http://hayleyanneperkins.com/blog/?p=3

I’ve been trying to think of an appropriate way to christen my new blog as Hayley Anne Perkins, but my ideas always seem to fall short, at least in my own mind.  I’m very conscious of the implications of blogging to an audience that comprises more than just your best friends and your mom… I’m vaguely terrified of saying, or rather typing, just the wrong thing in just the wrong way and coming across as a terrible person.  Or at least as a person with an overinflated sense of self-importance, which is just as bad in a blogger.

So to break the ice: my ode to NYC Teen Author Festival 2009.

To preface this extremely bizarre gobbledygook — NYCTAF09 (I’m lazy and enjoy acronyms) was awesome.   I had an amazing time meeting all of the authors and several readers, and everyone was really nice and extraordinarily “chill” for it being an autograph signing… given my boy band expertise, I’m used to autograph signings involving at least three fainters and a tablejumper.  I was glad to see that everyone was patient and open to conversing with everyone else in line as they waited, and it was a treat to see the way that the writers complemented (and complimented!) each other.

While most people at the event today brought or bought stacks of books by their favorite writers, I brought the ultimate book: the Dictionary.

I asked every author to sign over their favorite word, and I promised to take the collection of Best Words and write a little mishmash of a piece.  Elise Broach said that I should try to get them all in order, and I seriously considered it until I started trying to decipher the autographs, and I realized that I was forgetting the order already.  Sigh.

The form was promised to Judy Blundell for her choice — “poem” — and the tone to Heather Duffy-Stone… “lusty”.  Unfortunately for all parties involved, poetry is the second-furthest thing from being my forte (with Math beating it easily).  Anyone I’ve ever dated can attest.  Therefore, given that this is not only a poem, but a poem using nonsense words, I hope no one takes it TOO seriously as a test of my writing ability!  Unless you love it, in which case, this is totally how I write…

You couldn’t see it, but my eyes got very shifty at that last sentence.

And I have to say, David Levithan saying that he was excited to read the finished endeavor pretty much killed me.  So here goes.

Ned Vizzini Stole My Pen
A Lusty Poem

Twin popes –
one pulchritudinous, the other feculant
in appearance –
both indefatigable in their vast perversity,
though incredulous of the idealism of the other:
one a bonvivant in deep meditation on generosity and grace,
the other in love with his epiphany on ecstasy,
sneaked into the basement of the church
ignoring the musical comedy rehearsal
upstairs.

One facetiously donned a crash
the other merely a lush apron
as they prepared to bake treats
for their family reunion
beneath the moon.

There could be no peace between these two brothers.
Discussion broke down in their unctuous disregard for each other
like a luffing sailboat’s disregard for the wind
when fighting its way through a sluice
(in simile, not metaphor);
Something was always wrong.

As delicious purple rhubarb dumplings
vied for space amongst the donuts
an ephemeral smoke began to rise:
almost magical in its majesty
And the brothers watched,
thunderstruck.

As they watched in wonder,
the metal of the pots against the stove –
fulminate metals –
began to coruscate,
shooting sparks into the air.

The pastries were ruined.
The brothers found between them a new sublimity:
they no longer had to bring dessert to the reunion
thanks to a force majeure.

LOVE – Nora Baskin
PURPLE - Jessica Blank
POEM - Judy Blundell
MEDITATION – Coe Booth
ECSTASY - Elise Broach
PEACE - Susane Colasanti
EPIPHANY (BUT NOT IN A RELIGIOUS SENSE)* – Sarah Darer-Littman
GRACE (NOT CHRISTIAN GRACE)* – Matt de la Pena
LUST – Heather Duffy-Stone
GENEROSITY – Gayle Forman
LUSH – Aimee Friedman
UNCTUOUS – Madeleine George
POPE – Maureen Johnson
TWIN – Kristen Kemp
PULCHRITUDINOUS – Justine Larbalestier
WONDER – David Levithan
DUMPLING – E. Lockhart
CORUSCATE – Barry Lyga
FAMILY – Carolyn Mackler
RHUBARB – Sarah MacLean
SUBLIME – Megan McCafferty
DELICIOUS - Lauren McLaughlin
LUSH - Neesha Meminger
SOMETHING (BECAUSE “SOMETHING IS GOOD”) – Billy Merrell
CRASH – Blake Nelson
BONVIVANT – Micol Ostow
INCREDULOUS - David Ozanich
EPHEMERAL (BUT ONLY FOR TODAY) – Matthue Roth
FORCE MAJEURE - Marie Rutkoski
SNEAK – Lisa Ann Sandell
FACETIOUS (BUT FOR REAL) – Courtney Sheinmel
DONUT (NOT DOUGHNUT) – Brian Sloan
IDEALISM - Jennifer Smith
PERVERSITY – Rachel Vail
INCREDULOUS – David Van Etten
LUFF – Ned Vizzini
SLUICE – Adrienne Maria Vrettos
INDEFATIGABLE - Cecily von Ziegesar
MOON - Melissa Walker
THUNDERSTRUCK - Lynn Weingarten
FECULANT - Scott Westerfeld
VAST - Suzanne Weyn
MUSICAL COMEDY - Maryrose Wood
METAPHOR – Lizabeth Zindel

FULMINATE” and “MAGICAL,” I am so sorry, but I can’t read your autographs or remember who wrote them… if it was you, please reclaim your Favorite Word in a comment!

  • Share/Bookmark

November 21, 2009

The Boat That Rocked versus Pirate Radio: Why “Americanize” a story?

The Boat That Rocked versus Pirate Radio: Why "Americanize" a Story?

In October, I wrote a blog about my love for the soundtrack of British film The Boat That Rocked, which was re-released in America on Friday as Pirate Radio.  Given my (sadly, documented) love for Tom Sturridge, many a Twitter follower has asked for my opinion on the “Americanization” of the movie.

Here’s the thing.

I am American.  Born and bred.  Painfully Midwestern.

Young Carl in a moment of frustration with the hippie movement.

Young Carl in a moment of frustration with the hippie movement.

And I prefer the British version of the film.

There are pros and cons to both versions.  In Pirate Radio, I appreciate that the final shot of the film is the character of Young Carl, given that he is — for all intents and purposes — the actual protagonist.  I liked that we got a bit more of the crew of Radio Rock bonding at Christmas and playing Cluedo on deck, and I loved that the volume of the dialogue was bumped up to “discernable.”

However, I hated the shakycam effect… guess what?  Even without shakycam, I would have remembered that it took place on a boat!

I was terribly sad that Simple Simon’s stag party was cut from the American version, because it was such a cute scene and a beautiful way of showing the bonding of all the deejays.

Plus, cutting the singular line where Simon explains that he met “an American woman named Elenore” would cut out all of the “Whaa?” in Pirate Radio when suddenly (British) Simon’s new (assumedly British, until she opens her mouth) wife has a blaringly Midwestern accent.

WRONG ROOM!

WRONG ROOM!

Cutting Twatt’s expedition to the ship to discover the corrosion of the engines made the ending make less sense, and I missed Midnight Mark’s barrack full of naked girls, just because it further explained “How ’bout it, then?”  And because, as an American, the fact that those 30 seconds of film could contain 80 boobs really made me go, “Wow, this movie really IS European.”

I think the biggest difference overall was the pacing.  The Boat That Rocked feels like it takes place in the 1960s, with a salacious edge to its sweet silliness and an overexaggeration of male camaraderie that reminds me of The Monkees or A Hard Day’s Night.  It’s not a movie that I could ever confuse for one made in the ’60s themselves, but it channels the decade beautifully and in a way that makes me feel warm and happy when I watch it.  The scenes in The Boat That Rocked operate as sort of tenuously connected vignettes, kind of like watching a Brady Bunch marathon.

Elenore, Gee, I Think You're Swell... Ahh-AHHH...

Elenore, Gee, I Think You're Swell... Ahh-AHHH...

Pirate Radio does a better job of coercing the scenes into following a linear plotline — which, as a devotee of Young Carl, is pretty nice  because it gives him more of a focus, considering HE’S THE MAIN CHARACTER — but that, combined with the shakycam, was a little more reminiscent of an episode of Law & Order than Gidget.  It just feels much more like a modern movie, all streamlined and shiny and… shaky.  I guess I missed the sense of rambling that The Boat That Rocked has.  Kind of like a year at sea with a bunch of raucous renegade deejays on the unsuccessful run from the stodgy British government.

But overall?  Both movies are extremely enjoyable.  They have the same great music that makes you need to dance in your seat.  In either showing, you’d need to have a soul made of wood not to laugh when Nick Frost and Tom Sturridge are plotting in the bathroom.  And both movies are two hours of feel-good film, which is very hard to come by in this newfangled age.  But the “Americanized” Pirate Radio seems to have lost something in translation.


On an unrelated note, would this blog interest you more if I updated more often with sillier and shorter posts, or are sporadic posts that are slightly more worth reading a better plan?  Weigh in!

  • Share/Bookmark

November 4, 2009

NaNoWriMo Support Blog for The Penultimate Page

Read the original posting at The Penultimate Page or the NaNo Support ning.  Thanks, Emilee!


It happens to everyone.

You sit down at your computer, pull up WikiPedia to fact-check your Norse mythology…

And three hours later, you’re totally enthralled reading about the varieties of Japanese Kit-Kat bars.

As a writer, this is a totally normal progression of thought.  Writers are naturally interested in… well, everything.  No matter what genre you write, to flesh out a story is to create the world in which your characters live – often from the ground up: Do they live in a city or a town?  Is it a real place?  What’s the weather like, and how does that affect what your characters wear and do and drive (or not)?

Whether writing high fantasy or realistic contemporary chick lit, research is an essential part of the storycrafting process.

Say that you want to write an urban fantasy that sets a mortal girl from 1966 Chicago against a backdrop of Greek gods and teenage titans who take over the Art Institute.

Only… you were born in 1990, live in a suburban area of Kansas City, and you know nothing about Greek mythology beyond what you saw in Disney’s Hercules when you were eight.  And it was so scary that you cried and had to leave the room halfway through the film.

What do you need to research first?  And more importantly, how do you research it?

My personal opinion is the setting.  The first, and most salient, question to ask when researching a new setting is to explore your own motivations: Why do you want to set your story in that place – and at that time?

Before I make my next overarching statement, I need to own up: I was a History major in college.  I find research to be unbelievably fun, especially when it’s focused on cultural aspects that inform and shape the lives of characters (or, er, people).  So my next overarching statement about the research process of fiction is: Time is a place.

So for our sample plot bunny, you would need to research both “1966” and “Chicago” in the same way.  People, and characters, are products of both nurture and nature, and the “wheres” and “whens” of their existence dramatically shape the “whos” and “whys.”

In other words, changing someone’s clothing doesn’t make them live in any certain time period any more than simply saying that they live in Chicago means that they’re Chicagoan.  Think about your own life, and all of the things your “wheres” and “whens” affect: not just your clothing, but the foods you eat and the stores in which you shop, the kind of car your parents drive and the type of house you live in.  What was the first political event you remember?  Who was the first person you knew to say a “bad word” and what did they say?  What did you do when you came home from school, and what was your first job – or what do you think it will be?

What are your neighbors like?

How did you learn about sex?

Do you have to wear a school uniform?

How has your taste in music changed over the years?

As instinctive as the answers to these questions are in your own life, your character is not you.  At least, I hope not.  And at least not more than 15% you, as most characters are in some way inextricably tied to their creators.  All the same, you need to be able to answer these questions as quickly, certainly, and accurately for your characters as you did for yourself.

A good jumping point to discern just what aspects of your characters’ “whens” and “wheres” will be most important is the 100 Questions About Your Character survey (originally developed by tabletop gamers, but co-opted by writers everywhere).  You can find a clean copy at http://storywrite.com/contest/6584.

So now you know what you need to know.  But how to go about acquiring that knowledge?

Well, in my humble opinion – and on pain of death to anyone reading this who shares this tidbit with any of my old History professors – WikiPedia is a great place to start for basic outlines of information.  The key is to explore the depths of the “References” and “External Links.”  It’s like an ultra-concentrated Google search that doesn’t torture you with Boolean specifics – you can already reasonably guess that if the References on a page about Neighborhoods of Chicago says that it’s leading you to Wicker Park, it really is.  Score one for Web 2.0!

Of course, the flip side to WikiPedia’s greatness (besides those temptations to play The WikiPedia Game or clicking links until you end up looking at Japanese confectionery) is its overreaching broadness.  Great, so you’ve found a page on Neighborhoods of Chicago and it has eighty-six bajillion References.  How the heck do you know where to go and how to find just what you need to enhance your story?

My knee-jerk reaction is to advise that you read everything you can get your grubby little paws (sorry; werewolves on the brain!) on in regards to the world where your characters live.  Even the smallest details — the coloring of a candy wrapper, whether a street runs North-South or East-West — can prove to be integral to the integrity of your work.  Maybe your MC needs to chase Artemis down Wacker Drive.  Without research, a tense scene of hide-and-seek in the construction of its extension to the Lake Shore could never come to fruition, and a part of your plot arc would be lost.  You just never know!

However, I realize that most people have neither time nor gumption to read the encyclopedia.  I blame my own habit on the year I was in sixth grade, when I was so bored with classes that I decided to memorize the Almanac pages that came in our Assignment Notebooks.  However, the deeper you can get into the world of your characters, the more places they can lead you in developing their story, rather than you having to try to force along a plotline that is as thin as dental floss.  If you really understand your characters and their environment, then their linear arc can split off into a great golden web like Priori Incantatem, and your work can feel round and complete.  It’s the difference between a book you love and a book that changes the way you approach reading, writing, and seeing.

So take notes!  Whether you take notes manually – a great way to imprint the information you’re reading digitally, so you can rely more on your mind and less on said notes – or by bookmarking relevant pages, make sure that your hard work isn’t flowing in one ear and out the other.  Make columns for “Who,” “What,” “When,” “Where,” “Why,” and “How,” or categorize with a timetable of your characters’ day (Wake, Dress, Eat, School?, Work?, Eat, Free Time?, Sleep) to make sure you cover all of your bases.

The same rule goes for researching your supernatural creatures.  It isn’t enough to know the bare bones of their legends, or the image of what you’re trying to create.  The most successful stories know exactly why their mythologies function the way they do (even if it’s just convincing technobabble!).  If you don’t know the parameters of your magical beings, they’ll stretch and stretch until suddenly things sparkle that probably shouldn’t.   To break the rules, you need to know which directions they already bend.

So what does any of that have to do with Kit-Kat bars?

I have no idea.

But that’s the fun of worldbuilding.  Every world needs candy.

Some of my favorite research links:

http://www.foodtimeline.org/

http://www.flickr.com/groups/theretrokid/pool/

http://miss-vintage.com/

http://solomon.bltc.alexanderstreet.com/

http://asp6new.alexanderstreet.com/was2/was2.index.map.aspx

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/

http://www.wikipedia.org

http://www.oxfordlanguagedictionaries.com/

http://online.sagepub.com/

http://www.tvparty.com/

http://www.retrojunk.com/

http://www.inthe80s.com/

http://www.inthe70s.com/

http://www.nytimes.com/

http://www.factmonster.com/spot/fashiontime1.html

http://www.ventrella.com/Ideas/grammar.html

  • Share/Bookmark

October 5, 2009

Music Mondays: The Boat That Rocked Soundtrack

The Boat That Rocked My dad likes to tell the story of when he took me to a garage sale when I was about two and I picked up a discarded pricetag from the ground, held it up in the air, jumped up and down, and yelled, “LOOK!  I GOT A TICKET TO RIDE!”

My love affair with The Beatles began almost at birth.  This is actually sort of odd, since neither of my parents is a huge Beatlemaniac, but I distinctly remember that on one road trip up to Wisconsin to visit my grandparents when I was three, we listened to the Oldies Station and for the seven minutes that “Hey Jude” played, I finally sat still, shut up, and stopped performing an argumentative puppet show with my feet.

My left foot was Carpeachy.  My right foot was Carpoochy.  They didn’t agree on anything except that they liked “Hey Jude.”

The Beatles aren’t included on the soundtrack for The Boat That Rocked, a Richard Curtis film released in Europe a few months ago and due out — abridged, and under the name Pirate Radio – in America on November 13.  However, the soundtrack is as effervescent, raucous, and comforting as The Beatles’ best work.  Or at the very least, like an excellent deejay’s selections on the local Oldies station.

I think that the reason that I love oldies music is that, well, it seems like everyone loves oldies music. I’ve met very few people who don’t know at least a few Beatles songs, an Elvis, maybe some Neil Diamond they can’t name, or some unitelligible Bob Dylan.

Anyone who throws a party asserts their right to “cry if they want to, cry if they want to, cry if they want to,” and more people know Ecclesiastes to the rhythm sung by The Byrds than by any preacher.

“Oldies music” is the only genre I know that’s universally tolerated, and certainly almost universally enjoyed.

But really, there is nothing like watching the rain-slicked highway sliding past, and truly beautiful midwestern farm landscape — which I used to hate, but living here for years now, really out in the middle of the farmland, it’s something I’ve grown to really love.  The richly variegated fields of grass and green soybean shoots…

And I get really overexcited whenever we see cows that are doing anything besides eating (sitting cows are exciting, but cows walking around make me bounce up and down in my seat!).

The drives when the gray clouds are hanging low over the silos are so peaceful — listening to “Hey Jude,” or “Windy,” or “Incense and Peppermints.”

“Sympathy for the Devil.”

“Son of a Preacher Man.”

The songs that everyone knows, and everyone sings along.

When the rain slicks are lit by headlights like streaks of stellar motion and the landscape is twinkling with lights on faraway towers and white-curtained windows in the weathered farmhouses, the music of my parents’ generation doubling as my soundtrack, the rural midwest seems so much more majestic than I ever thought Chicago or New York City to be.

The soundtrack also benefits from undeniable earworms like The Turtles’ “Elenore” (Elenore, gee I think you’re swell… ahhhh-AHHHHH…) and “The Letter” by The Boxtops.  The songs that just make you happy, until you realize they’ve been stuck in your head for three days.

Although I’d like to press that I’m glad to have “All Day and All of the Night” stuck in my head instead of “Single Ladies,” for a change.  It’s about time, honestly.

Taylor Hanson once summed up the popularity of his song “Mmmbop” and other earworms as, “The first music you really fall in love with is more than just music. it is something that clicks in you beyond the song, it’s a message or image that causes you to jump in and not let go.”

I fully agree with that.  For me, at least, the music that I heard in my parents’ cars when I bothered to sit and be quiet, or became enthralled with in goofy action sequences on The Monkees, or heard while waiting to see if someone would dance with me at the fourth grade Sock Hop, has become so ingrained in my being that listening to the soundtrack of The Boat That Rocked is like wrapping myself up in a quilt of my own life history, even though all of its music was made long before I was even born.  It doesn’t matter.  It’s the music that taught me what music feels like.

I think people who can truly live a life in music are telling the world, ‘You can have my love, you can have my smiles. Forget the bad parts, you don’t need them. Just take the music, the goodness, because it’s the very best, and it’s the part I give.”  — George Harrison, 1943 – 2001.

“To all our listeners, this is what I have to say – God bless you all. And as for you bastards in charge, don’t dream it’s over. Years will come, years will go, and politicians will do **** all to make the world a better place. But all over the world, young men and young women will always dream dreams and put those dreams into song. Nothing important dies tonight, just a few ugly guys on a crappy ship. The only sadness tonight is that, in future years, there’ll be so many fantastic songs that it will not be our privilege to play. But, believe you me, they will still be written, they will still be sung and they will be the wonder of the world. … Hit It!” — Philip Seymour Hoffman & Rhys Ifans, The Boat That Rocked/Pirate Radio, 2009

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

September 18, 2009

Friday Free-For-All: Letters Survey

Leave me a comment and I will give you a letter. Then, go to your journal and post ten things you love starting with that letter. Give your friends letters, too.

My beautiful friend Indira petiiit gave me the letter “M.”

  1. Madeline Kahn in Clue.
  2. Mexican Hot Chocolate Mochas from Innkeepers.  OK, they’re called “Cococcinos,” but the description is Mexican Hot Chocolate Mocha.
  3. Macadamia nuts.  Deelish.
  4. Mr. Robert Pattinson.  I maintain that this counts.  If you get “D,” you can put Dame Maggie Smith.  Or “S,” Sir Paul McCartney.  It’s all kosher.
  5. Mid-90’s sitcoms.
  6. Midcentury celebrities: George Harrison, Pattie Boyd, Paul McCartney, Jane Asher, Keith Richards, Marianne Faithfull, Ringo Starr, etc etc etc.
  7. Markers.
  8. Mickey Mouse.  Double M’s; I win!
  9. Mu Shu Vegetable.
  10. Mr. Feeny!
  • Share/Bookmark

August 12, 2009

Wednesday Word Post: “Party Like It’s 1959,” Ann Hood

Filed under: Wednesday Word Posts — Tags: , , , — admin @ 11:32 am

* * * FULL CITATION UNDER ARTICLE * * *

This article, written by a novelist for Food & Wine Magazine, is among my top three favorite prose pieces of all time. It is also one of maybe two written things to make me cry (the others being HPDH). Once again, like I said with the Kerouac article and the Dylan piece: It’s long, but I SO recommend reading the whole thing.

When I was a child, dinner parties seemed to belong to some vague and distant grown-up world where women wore shiny dresses with tight bodices and full skirts, bright lipstick and strings of perfect pearls. The men, I imagined, wore ties and wing tips. They drank fancy cocktails and ate prime rib on heavy china. This image came from Saturday afternoon movies and glossy magazines, pictures of an adult world I could only peek into. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

July 31, 2009

Friday Free-For-All: “25 Things”

Hey, remember a few months ago when the “Twenty-Five Random Facts About Me” meme was considered a huge cultural phenomenon?

  1. My favorite words are “constellation” and “quintessential,” and I wish I could find more uses to say or write “syzygy” in my day-to-day life.
  2. All four books in the Green quartet have passages written.  None of them, thus far, include “syzygy.”
  3. I can’t focus without having either music or television on in the background of whatever I’m doing. Having a built-in distraction keeps me from searching for one.
  4. More often than not, I’d rather be eating Chinese food.
  5. The albums I’m listening to right now are Heroes & Thieves by Vanessa Carlton, Folie A Deux by Fall Out Boy, all of Robert Pattinson’s sundry unreleased tracks, and the 2009 tracks by Open Till Midnight.  I also listen Owl City’s “Fireflies” a LOT.
  6. In regards to many Pieces of Flair, would take Jim Halpert over Edward Cullen any day. I’d actually take pretty much anyone over Edward Cullen. But almost no one over Jim Halpert.
  7. I idolize Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen to this day.  I originally joined their Fun Club in 1990.  I am not currently an active member, except maybe in spirit.  …Winning minds, winning hearts, Winning London.
  8. I prefer salty over sweet and hot beverages to cold beverages. Potato chips and hot cocoa is the best snack.  I really eat way too many potato chips.
  9. I’d rather see a local band in concert than a big, signed, super-professional band. I prefer the atmosphere of hope to one of smug success.  I’m also really into has-beens, in a sad kind of way.
  10. There’s nothing more beautiful in the world than the Manhattan skyline at night — my favorite is the Chrystler Building.
  11. My favorite movie is secretly Superbad. I tend to tell people it’s Clue.
  12. If I could have any three guests to dinner, I would invite J.K. Rowling, Jack Kerouac, and George Harrison.
  13. I still get American Girl catalogs in the mail.
  14. I HATE socks. I HATE socks. HATE.
  15. I will always prefer YA and 6-8 novels to novels written for adults.  “The salient fact of an adolescent girl’s existence is her need for a secret emotional life—one that she slips into during her sulks and silences, during her endless hours alone in her room, or even just when she’s gazing out the classroom window while all of Modern European History, or the niceties of the passé composé, sluice past her. This means that she is a creature designed for reading in a way no boy or man, or even grown woman, could ever be so exactly designed, because she is a creature whose most elemental psychological needs—to be undisturbed while she works out the big questions of her life, to be hidden from view while still in plain sight, to enter profoundly into the emotional lives of others—are met precisely by the act of reading.” — Atlantic Monthly|Dec08
  16. I have a presumptuous fascination with molecular gastronomy and experimental haute cuisine. The best meal of my life was at Alinea; I have philosophical problems with Moto; and I feel that I will never be important enough to get a reservation at El Bulli, but relish the idea that someday I may get to go to Adriano Zumbo at Balmain.
  17. I have terrible taste in movies, and I know it. But I genuinely believe that I have the best taste in music in the entire freaking world.
  18. Secretly, I kind of wish I could dress like a hipster.
  19. The only person I really talk to on the phone is my Gramma, three times a week (or more).
  20. I love the New York Times, and prefer it to the Chicago Tribune.  I hate the New York Post with a passion.
  21. I wish it were always raining, and I love thunderstorms more than anything.
  22. I’ve read fanfiction for twelve years.  ::Facepalm::
  23. I have a complete fascination with superheroes and often like to pretend that they’re real. Particularly Spider-Man and the X-Men.  The only person I would date right now were they to ask is Spider-Man.  Or, I guess, Peter Parker.
  24. The only colors I’ll really wear are black, white, red, and turquoise. If I could pull off kelly green, I’d wear that, too, but I can’t.
  25. If I could live in any year, it would be 1964.
  • Share/Bookmark

July 22, 2009

Wednesday Word Post: “New York’s Lower East Side” by Fred Ferretti

* Full Citation Under Article*

I will never know how, but my mother always knows it when she comes across an article or story that will inspire me.  For as long as I can remember, she’s left open newspapers, stapled-together magazine pages, or cutout strips of imagery on my kitchen table or nightstand or in boxes in the mail for me — a few of which became the things that I posted the links to above, and almost all of which are the secret little jewels that have strung together in the back of my mind to become the prism through which I see the world.

This article was one of the gifts that started it all.  I noticed the date on it for the first time as I started to type it up — 1986.  Before I was even born.

It’s like she knew to save it for me.

Sunday Shopping on Orchard Street

The Lower East Side — its tenements and stoops (the verandas of the poor), the ornate iron façades of its old lofts, the once-noble limestone and terra-cotta Greco-Roman noses of its bas-relief statuary blunted by time and weather — is in some ways the most American patch of real estate in the country.  It is where the waves of New York’s immigrant history come together, where old country traditions survive because those who live there will not let them be forgotten.

The area is a shtetl where Eastern European Jews create a shopping bazaar out of a street named Orchard; where Italian and Sicilian immigrants keep the caffé and pasticcerie of their grandfathers open; where elderly Chinese from Toisan clack their mah-jongg tiles at the end of the work day just as they once did in their Cantonese village; where Ukrainians patiently paint their eggs at Easter, those exquisite pysanky, as intricately as if they were designing for Fabergé, and pray only in the language of their old country among the icons in St. George’s Church on East Seventh Street on Sundays.

Some of the narrow streets of the Lower East Side look quite as they did in the 1880s, when they were lined with pushcarts peddling everything from vegetables to clothing, when Tompkins Square Park was the new home to New York’s Polish immigrants rather than a center of impending gentrification with its own tiny Greenmarket, when Second Avenue was known as “Knish Alley” or the “Jewish Rialto” and contained no fewer than fifteen legitimate theaters.  Then, Allen Street was a place to shpatsir and kibitz, to stroll and to chat, and Eleventh Street became a nighly clubhouse for elderly men who would congregate, drink think, bitter coffee, eat pasticciotti and sfogliatelle, and reminisce about when they were young in Italy.

Within its borders you can see painted on the sides of buildings the studied calligraphies of the Semitic alphabet and of Chinese symbols.  In the shops you can rub antique silver menorahs and bite into pumpernickels and pickles; smell the aromas coming from copper and brass espresso machines and taste creamy mascarpone and thick, crusy pane rustico; plunk at the strings of the mandolinlike Ukrainian musical instrument, the bandura, and chew on that finest of sausages, krakiewska, made only of smoked ham; and run your fingers across Qing embroideries and savor crisp, lacquered roast goose.
(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark

June 19, 2009

On Fandom, Part I

Filed under: Creative Writing, Monday Music Recs — Tags: , , , — admin @ 8:32 pm

I have been so disturbed and disgusted by the lack of respect and common decency for the safety of Robert Pattinson in New York this week that I’ve been cobbling together a treatise on fandom.  It’s not quite finished yet, but in its writing, I keep going back to my original study of fandom, a year ago… copied here, because I love it.

- – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – -

One Bare Shoulder

Reprinted with permission from Pop Matters Online.  Original publication date 28 May 2008.

http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/one-bare-shoulder-the-effect-of-dream-street-on-the-sexual-identity-of-the-

The first time I saw Dream Street was on July 8, 2001. I was 14 years old, and I was watching cartoons with my sister, who was seven at the time. The average older sister that I was, I didn’t enjoy spending time with her, but I was grumpy that day, because it had been almost a month since I’d heard from my boyfriend. I sat with her and watched television. We’d been kicking each other across the sofa all through the insipid Hey Arnold! on Nickelodeon when a commercial break came on and I saw the boy in the center, singing and dancing in a shining blue camouflage T-shirt and dark, baggy shorts. He had spiky brown hair, a tan, and a blindingly white smile. He was the most perfect boy I could have imagined.

Discovering Dream Street is one of the flashbulb memories of my life. In under a week, I had begun my own fansite, an amateur non-for-profit website that functioned as a massive shrine to the band, and within a month, I had become deeply immersed in the teenipop subculture. Like other teenipoppers, I dreamed of traveling to swinging London to become a royal and find a cute musician boyfriend, like Amanda Bynes’ Daphne Reynolds in the film What a Girl Wants; of crashing a music video shoot and earning both a dancing role and a kiss beneath the mistletoe like Lizzie McGuire; of jet-setting to swank European countries and going on unlimited shopping sprees with beautiful boys to a soundtrack of my favorite music like the peppy Olsen twins. I knew immediately of the actions of Dream Street, those beautifully stylized youths who could lift themselves, and me, in my infatuation-addled mind, from humdrum normalcy.

* * *

“There’s an endless supply of 12-year-old girls waiting for someone to sing to them,” wrote Emily White in her December 2002 New York Times article concerning the end of the band. By the end of 2002, when Dream Street’s final hurrah was earned—the honor of a feature story in the Times—the boy band scene was reviled. The music scene was changing rapidly from effervescent, pure pop (*NSync’s eponymous 1998 American debut or Britney Spears’ …Baby One More Time in 1999) to cloudier, more R&B-influenced or post-pop punk fare (Sum41’s Fat Lip in 2001, B2K’s 2002 album Pandemonium). The goals of mainstream pop had changed.

In its heyday, the ideal boy band image was best summed up by Salon.com writer Janelle Brown as “a handful of clean-cut boys next door…turned…into fuzzy, desexualized plush toys that you’d feel safe leaving with your 14-year-old daughter”. The androgynizing of the boy band was, at least until 2000, money in the bank. However, by late 2002 the image of this milquetoast masculinity was no longer considered desirable as music groups like *NSync and Backstreet Boys had taken on a harder image and no longer found fame singing swooning lyrics that read like prepubescent blog entries. For most of America, the boy band era was over. Twelve-year-old girls no longer wanted the nice boy who crooned sweet nothings in her ear. (more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress