Home Biography Metempsyche Blog Bibliophilia Random & Fan Contact

February 15, 2010

Steering the U.S.S. Blogfail to Starboard…

And answering the questions posed in my last post!

BUT FIRST!  A reminder!  If you haven’t read TRIBOCHARGE yet, then what are you waiting for?

Tribocharge

Tribocharge

Tribocharge
A Metempsyche companion short story
http://www.hayleyanneperkins.com/tribocharge/
Tribocharge: A type of contact electrification in which an object becomes electrically charged after coming into contact with another object.

Lightning bolts wounded beautifully, but they healed ugly.

Peter Borley knew this. He saw it a little more every day in his grandpa, Alexander, whose light dimmed just a bit more every morning as his tungsten veins reignited and his skin — pink and shiny, rippled from the current — showed through.

When Indira P. of Brazil (our Supporter of the Moment January 2010) started metempsyche and so many amazing readers joined so quicky to support Green, The Metempsyche novels, and my writing, I decided that I really needed to give something back.

The first offering I have is Peter Borley.

Peter is one of my very favorite characters to inhabit the Metempsyche universe, and he was my natural choice to star in the first Metempsyche companion short story. Because a release of Green itself is still TBA, I wanted to be able to give something (always spoiler-free!) back to the community members, readers, and well-wishers to whom I feel so indebted. I’m hoping to release a short story starring one of the secondary or tertiary characters from the Metempsyche world every 6-8 weeks for as long as I’m able, and Peter Borley the neighborhood poltergeist is just the first!

With that, my interrogation from you begins!

From Mary:

What I’d like to know about you is this: How do you walk around in the shoes you do? I’m speaking literally – I would fall down dead and die if I tried to wear your shoes in the rain (I loved your shoes in Kent) – and figuratively; how do you maintain a good head on your shoulders whilst being so talented and genuinely kind?

Aw, well, thank you miss Mary!

As for the literal “walking in my shoes” — I guess the best explanation that I have is that I took dance for sixteen years (and thus have very little feeling in my toes) and that in my last two years of high school, I wore heels every day.  I was Rachel Berry from Glee, dressing like both a toddler and a grandmother at the same time.  Although… I’ve never owned a pantsuit, thankfully.

My favorite pairs of shoes that I own:

Except in lime green!

These are my #1 favorite pair, except mine are in lime green!

As for the second half of your very sweet question, the answer is simple: I never lie, at least not intentionally.  My freshman and sophomore years of college, I dated a truly horrendous, emotionally abusive, ridiculous, spoiled, awful boy to whom I told three very big lies in an attempt to scare him into being a better person.  After the upkeep of those lies cost me several very good friends and didn’t do anything to make him stop hurting the people around him, I wised up, broke up with him, and proceeded never to lie again.  I might sometimes withhold information from people if I think my opinion would hurt them, but a lie of omission is very different than telling a lie, in my opinion.

From Sam:

This is anything but deep… what’s your favorite kind of ice cream?

My favorite kind of ice cream in the entire world is tragically extinct.  There’s a small ice cream shop in my town that’s owned and run by this very sweet, old Vietnamese woman, and they used to carry this very delicious ice cream called Fudgy Pudding, which was, literally, frozen chocolate pudding with brownie pieces and chocolate fudge chips.  Unfortunately, I was apparently the only person in town who liked it, so they don’t carry it anymore, and I am always sad about it.

Of ice creams that still exist, I’m sort of an old person and I either like amaretto-cherry or spumoni.  As my friend Justin once asked me, “You really like sweets that taste like they’re supposed to be dusty, don’t you?”

Yes.  Yes, I do.

Thank you to Liz, Jacee, and Ashley for your comments as well!

  • Share/Bookmark

January 18, 2010

HAP Interviewed!: The Art of Losing Interview Repost

Filed under: HAP: Interviewed — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 9:35 pm

The Art of Losing Interviews Hayley Anne Perkins

Originally Posted 16 January 2010.

Since you put me on the spot, I’m going to have to do the same to you! Without alluding to your writing career or your love of reading, describe yourself. Who is Hayley Anne Perkins?

I’ve been a professional graphic designer for almost ten years. My taste in music is so bad that it’s circled back around to being awesome, kind of like how pugs are so ugly that they’ve rounded the twist to cuteness. I worked as a journalist during and after college, both in print and as an assisant/intern on a documentary for PBS. I have over 10,000 photographs from sixth grade through college, arranged chronologically in photo albums, and they take up a majority of the wall space in my living room. Everything important that I’ve ever learned, I learned from Mr. Feeny or Professor Dumbledore.

Now, on to Green! Briefly summarize, please.

You know how teenagers all think they’re the center of the universe and it changes their lives to discover they’re not? Well, my main character’s life changes when she discovers that she IS. Oh, and her boyfriend is a werewolf.

More seriously, Green is a YA paranormal romance with a few twists — not only is the girl, as well as her love interest, supernatural, but she’s more powerful than he is; Green has a strong tie to real history and historical figures, as well as historical fiction; and I tried to stay away from “traditional” supernatural creatures as much as possible (outside of Werewolf Boyfriend). Rather than culling the majority of my characters from popular Greco-Roman or Norse mythologies, I explored stories and creatures from Japanese, Maori, Celtic, Breton, and Germanic traditions (among others).

And there are no vampires.

Spoilers aside, what would you consider the major themes of Green and the rest of the books of the Metempsyche series? How will the rest of the books in the series be different from Green?

I would say that the central theme of Green is the growing awareness of both self and world that everyone experiences in their adolescence. Of course, Lindy gains this awareness through her transformation into a pillar of the supernatural world’s pantheon (the “Metempsyche”), but also – paradoxically – more human channels as she grows into her romantic relationship with werewolf Daniel. Given that all of the planned books in the series take place within the span of only a few months, that theme stays fairly central, but obviously takes different routes and tackles different obstacles. The second book will likely be the darkest — Green is moderately light, just because I’m not a terrifically angsty person — and will follow Lindy to some pretty scary places in both the past and present, as well as within herself. The third book, as of now, is planned to take a look at the tangled web that is friendship. The fourth book I’m keeping a secret, so you’ll just have to read it!

And how is Green different from other books of the YA fiction genre?

I think that the biggest difference is that while Lindy and Daniel’s love story heavily influences the plot, the crux of the novel is not in their romance. Rather than “OMG new sexy supernatural boyfriend! THIS IS THE BE-ALL, END-ALL OF MY LIFE!”, their relationship helps Lindy to find an anchor in her new existence as a supernatural herself, treating the tropes of immortality, power, and perpetual youth as coming-of-age issues, and not ideals. It would kind of really suck to be a teenage forever, or rather to live hundreds of separate lifetimes of having to go through the same pangs and trials of puberty and adolescence over and over. Getting your period for the first time is traumatic enough once, thanks. Wondering if that cute boy is mean to you because he likes you or because he’s a jerk is confusing enough the first time. At the same time, there is nothing like being a teenager. It’s a very universal experience (no pun intended) despite the fact that it’s all about discovering and cultivating your individuality. The dichotomy of being teenage is something I strived to touch on with Lindy’s narrative.

I’m also going to tentatively say that the structure is somewhat unique, but I’m not sure I can reveal too much without it being a huge spoiler. Or possibly a lie, although I don’t think so.

Some writers say when they are writing a story that they are writing solely for their own enjoyment and writing the story that they themselves would want to read. Some writers, on the other hand, write with a specific audience in mind. Which would you say holds true for you?

The best writing advice given to me by any of my college professors was, “Write your rough draft for yourself. For all of your revisions, pick one person — one specific, tangible person you know — and revise the book for them.” There’s definitely a specific audience, or pop (sub)culture, that I identify with and to whom Green will appeal, and I don’t mind that at all. It’s actually really encouraging, and kind of terrifying. The Green/Metempsyche Novels/Hayley Anne Perkins Fan Club on LiveJournal already has over 80 members, based purely on my blogs and the synopsis of the manuscript, and I think the fact that this idea strikes such a chord with people who haven’t even read the book yet speaks highly of knowing how you can appeal to other readers like you.

But of course, Jacee, you mostly asked this because you’re the person for whom I revised the book, and I will not begrudge you the shoutout!

Stories often undergo a lot of editing before even the first reader, other than the author, lays eyes upon it. How different would you say the version of Green that you now have in your hands is from the first spark of inspiration you had for Lindy’s story? Do you think it will change much more from now until publication?

This might be a mistake to say, but I hope that it does change before it hits shelves. I’m really excited to find an agent and then an editor, and to get a copy of the manuscript covered in red ink in the mail. I’m weird and really love getting revision suggestions and edits — particularly if they’re specific — from someone I respect and trust and whom I know has the best interests of my characters in mind.

Changes that have happened already… Well, Lindy’s name wasn’t Lindy until 30,000 words into the rough draft. She is no longer a cheerleader, and doesn’t fight the FBI. Green was originally much more like an action book than a romance, but this was years and years ago. The current draft (of the romance incarnation) has a different villain than the rough, too!

Would you say that recent trends in YA fiction have at all influenced the development of the Metempsyche series? If so, to what extent, and how?

Yes and no. I didn’t write Green as a paranormal romance because that’s what’s on shelves now; I wrote it as a paranormal romance because that’s what the story is. It was always encouraging to see deals being made and debut authors being released within the same genre, but I only started really tracking that once I had pinned down the first 50k or so of the rough draft and really realized, “OK, this book is a paranormal romance. Is there still a market for that?”

One thing that did influence the way that I wrote Green was definitely my personal negative reaction to books that glorify “dark” (otherwise known as “actually, that’s pretty emotionally abusive”) romantic leads, or reinforce female sexual roles that I consider detrimental. I’m not into the idea of a relationship based in large part on swooning — though in my opinion, Daniel is very swoonworthy, don’t get me wrong. However, I dislike the emphasis that a lot of YA paranormal romances seem to put on controlling or dominant males who make all of the decisions regarding the whats and whens (both physical and emotional) of their relationships, and I really worked to make Lindy and Daniel equals in all aspects.

Sometimes, I confess, the scale tips a little in Lindy’s favor in terms of who wears the pants, but hey, she’s the universe. She does wear the cosmic pants.

I hear that you will soon be releasing short stories centering on some of the periphery characters of the Metempsyche series. Besides Lindy, your protagonist, and Daniel, her love interest, which of the characters in Green do you favor the most and for what reasons, and which do you think has the most interesting backstory? Which character do you identify the most with?

I don’t want to spoil too much! Let’s see…

I love my hipster poltergeist. His short story is coming first. I adored creating my rokurokubi — a Japanese demon — and I think she’s totally kickass. My regenerist vexes me in all the best writerly ways — she’s the character who makes me stop what I’m doing sometimes and go, “Wait, if your body can heal a [blankity blank blank], then what would happen if you [blank]? Could you [blankity blank]? I need a medical journal!”

As for who has the most interesting backstory, all I will say is that you can decide for yourself as the short stories and book[s] are released.

Did you draw from any real-life experience or acquaintance inspiration for any parts of Green or its characters? How much would you say you are like Lindy?

There are small moments of Lindy’s life that are taken from things that happened to me — just small anecdotal things that she or Daniel or her mother might mention in passing. There is one character who is a sort of homage to the friend with whom I was staying when I both started, and finished, the manuscript, but I don’t really like when books are made up of the author and her/his friends, masked only by thin veneers or de-aging. The most fun that I have in writing is creating my characters, so I really like to start with a blank slate!

How would you describe your writing style? Are you the type to plan as you go or must you have sorted out all the details before you begin writing? Do you tend to write straight through or in bits and pieces that come together in the end?

I have the entire series plotted out day-by-day on a calendar, down to weather details (which, really, when you’re writing about so many supernatural creatures, even the most mundane meteorological changes can be very important), but I don’t write in order. I tend to write from the middle of the book. Part of what I like about writing with an outline is the ability to write “as I’m inspired” while still staying on track.

Would you say that your writing style is inspired by any particular writers? If so, whom?

Hmm… Chelsea from The Page Flipper compared me to Jane Austen, which was very cool. I think that was more in the way that I crafted Lindy and Daniel’s love story than in my actual writing style, but either way, I took it as a huge compliment. Indira Petit, who started the first Green/Metempsyche Novels fan group on LiveJournal, wrote a beautiful review on her blog comparing me to J.K. Rowling, which was my middle school dream come true.

OK, and my adult dream come true. I’ll admit it.

I’m very inspired by the writing styles of Jack Kerouac and F. Scott Fitzgerald — very lush, full of imagery, erring a bit on the verbose side. I’m not one for short, muscular sentences, and I think that the smaller actions between people are often more interesting than huge RUNNING KICKING FACEPUNCHING CAR EXPLOSION! action scenes.

Except in movies, wherein — to quote The Princess Diaries — It’s very hard for me to pay attention unless there’s dancing or explosions.

As of now, what are your goals for the future? What would you consider success?

I just want to find the right representation for Green and the Metempsyche universe so that I can do right by Lindy, Daniel, and the rest of the characters in this world. I don’t want to disappoint the amazing supporters that the series has somehow already garnered, and for them I want to know that I’ve written the best book that I can. And success to me would be walking into a bookstore and being able to pick up a beautiful hardcover copy of Green from a display table.

Finally, what is the current status of Green?

Green is currently being shopped to agents. Outside of that, I’m not sure what I can say without getting sort of iffy on ethics. In other words, REAL-LIFE SPOILER ALERT!

Or something.

For the most reliable updates on Green’s progress through publishing, you can sign up for the e-mail list at http://www.hayleyanneperkins.com (with the form in the sidebar). You can also follow me on Twitter or Facebook for many minor updates and to chat with me, and Indira and Suzanne Keller do an amazing job keeping the LiveJournal fan community for the Metempsyche novels up-to-date.

  • Share/Bookmark

January 3, 2010

HAP Gets Interviewed!: a girl and her books Interview

a girl and her books Interview

Originally Posted 31 December 2009

Hayley let me interview her for my tiny corner of the world! So without further ado:

1. I know you get asked this only all the time, but explain Green to someone who has never ever heard of it?

It depends… sometimes I make a lame joke and say, “You know how teenagers all think they’re the center of the universe and it changes their lives to discover they’re not?  Well, my main character’s life changes when she discovers that she IS.  Oh, and her boyfriend is a werewolf.”

Other times, I’m more serious and explain that it’s a YA paranormal romance with a few twists — not only is the girl, as well as her love interest, supernatural, but she’s more powerful than he is; Green has a strong tie to real history and historical figures, as well as historical fiction; and I tried to stay away from “traditional” supernatural creatures as much as possible (outside of Werewolf Boyfriend).  Rather than culling the majority of my characters from popular Greco-Roman or Norse mythologies, I explored stories and creatures from Japanese, Maori, Celtic, Breton, and Germanic traditions (among others).  And then I usually close with another lame quip of, “And there are no vampires.”

2. What got you into writing Green?

It’s funny, but the story of my connection to this plot and the character of Lindy Cook (the protagonist) could be said to have begun any number of places.  I never sat down and said, “OK, I’d like to write a novel. I’d like for it to have fantastical elements and historical fiction, and lots of kissyface, and… and…” Instead, Green and the rest of the Metempsyche universe feel very organic to me. It’s the story I was always meant to write.

I actually just remembered the other day that in sixth grade, the author Debbi Chocolate (Imani in the Belly) came to my school and ten kids — including me — were chosen to do a writing workshop with her.  She gave us thirty minutes to write a story, and mine was about a teenage girl who took one-hundred years to age one year, basically giving her a first-person account of most of the major events in history.  Obviously, that’s not really Lindy, at all, given the synopsis of Green, but I feel like it shows an inherent interest of mine to create one character who has gotten to experience… everything.

More specifically, and less cheesily, the idea for the basic identity of Lindy’s character — a high school girl who was literally the embodiment of the universe — came to me when I was sixteen myself. However, her name wasn’t Lindy, she was a cheerleader, and the rest of the world in which she lived was pretty much nonexistent. Oh, and she was supposed to fight the FBI or something, I don’t know. I tried a few times to write her story, but it never panned out. I never got further than a prologue full of shadowy no-ones and a lot of running.

I never forgot about the idea, but I also stopped attempting to do anything about it until one early early morning about six months after my college graduation. Through the rest of high school, college, and after, I explored all different genres of writing — playwriting and screenwriting, hard-boiled mystery, journalism, chick lit.  I never really attempted paranormal romance or urban fantasy, but the bug was still there.  Then, I went back to campus to visit my best friend, who writes really fascinating comic books. I fully maintain that there’s just some sort of fantastical idea-bug in the air wherever she is, because I fell asleep… I woke up at five o’clock in the morning… wrote 25 pages of what was to be Green… and fell back asleep. When I woke at a more reasonable time, I found the pages, reread what I’d written, and just felt that it was right.

3. How long did it take from first writing Green to the publishing world?

Well, I guess depending on where you’d count the start date, either twelve years and counting, six years and counting, or just over a year and counting.  But there’s still a long road left to go.  I don’t think that the process of a writer is ever really done.  That might be a bastardized Michelangelo Buonarroti quote, but I’m not sure.

4. What is your dream job that is not in the literary field?

Cafe-owning ballerina on broadway.

5. What book, or book series do you consider to be highly overrated?

I have never read a single Animorphs book, and I don’t think I ever will.  I also think that people give Ernest Hemingway WAY too much credit.

6. Is there a certain genre of books you just cannot get into?

I’m not a fan of really hardcore scifi or epic fantasy.  I respect it for how much research and detail is put into the stories, but I usually have a hard time reconciling the stories with the ideas they present — if characters are living on a planet a different distance from their sun than Earth, and with different geographic and anthropological boundaries than Earth, I just don’t believe that they would eat three meals a day and pull out a pocketwatch to check the time.  I think that’s part of the reason that I do really enjoy paranormal romance and urban fantasy, though — I love the idea of “our world plus otherworld.”  Otherworld on its own is a little much for me, I guess.

7. If you could only read five books, a series could count as one book, for the rest of your life which five?

The Dharma Bums by Jack Kerouac, The Universe in a Nutshell by Dr. Stephen Hawking, The Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, and the Princess Diaries series by Meg Cabot, only I wouldn’t bring Princess on the Brink on account of the Michael/Judith thing.

8. I know you were a fellow history major. What got you into history and made you decide to major in it?

I’ve always been fascinated by history.  As a very small child, all of my favorite movies took place in the first half of the 20th Century (Pete’s Dragon, Bedknobs & Broomsticks, Summer Magic, Polly).  Then I discovered the American Girl series, and history had me at Samantha Parkington.

I have a theory that there are so many historical fiction series for girls because pre-teen and teen girls are inherently nosy and want to know about other girls’ stuff: “What are her clothes like?  What kinds of boys does she know?  What does she do for fun?”

History majors just never lose that nosiness.  I focused on social history and emphasized pop culture history and its effect on adolescent girls (my thesis was on The Beatles & Boy Bands!) and it opened a lot of diaries, closets, and idealized fantasy crushes for me to explore.  That was fun.

9. What is your favorite 90’s cartoon?

Doug!  Actually, most of the cartoons I watched in the ’90s are probably actually considered cartoons of the ’70s and ’80s.  I watched a lot of Muppet Babies and Care Bears, and my dad and I made a tradition of The Rocky & Bullwinkle Show.  You can read about my eccentric taste in cartoons here: http://hayleyanneperkins.com/blog/?p=229

10. Anything else?

I just want to thank everyone who has shown support for me and for my writing, especially over the rollercoaster of new experiences that was 2009.  And Happy New Year!

  • Share/Bookmark

HAP Interviewed!: Interview Repost from Breathe Me

Breathe Me Interviews Hayley Anne Perkins

Originally Posted 08 December 2009

First let’s talk about Green in general and then get into more of you, Hayley Anne Perkins, as a person. Here you go.

Breathe Me: What was your inspiration to begin writing Green?

Hayley Anne Perkins: Well, that’s sort of a tricky question. I really have no idea! I never sat down and said, “OK, I’d like to write a novel. I’d like for it to have fantastical elements and historical fiction, and lots of kissyface, and… and…” Instead, Green and the rest of the Metempsyche universe feel very organic to me. It’s the story I was always meant to write.
More specifically, and less cheesily, the idea for the basic identity of Lindy’s character — a high school girl who was literally the embodiment of the universe, of all history — came to me when I was sixteen myself. However, her name wasn’t Lindy, she was a cheerleader, and the rest of the world in which she lived was pretty much nonexistent. Oh, and she was supposed to fight secret agents or something, I don’t know. I tried a few times to write her story, but it never panned out since I didn’t really have any direction. I never got further than a prologue full of shadowy no-ones.

I never forgot about the idea, but I also stopped attempting to do anything about it until one early early morning about six months after my college graduation. I went back to campus to visit my best friend, who writes comic books and comes up with, probably, a story idea a day. I fully maintain that there’s just some sort of fantastical idea-bug in the air wherever she is, because I fell asleep… I woke up at five o’clock in the morning… wrote 25 pages of what was to be Green… and fell back asleep. When I woke at a more reasonable time, I found the pages, reread what I’d written, and just felt that it was right.

BM: How do you feel about people calling your Daniel Haliburton the new Edward Cullen?

HAP: Flattered, embarrassed, incredulous, awed, bemused, and a little terrified. And that doesn’t even get into what I think about it — just how I feel!

BM: The book isn’t even released yet and you have very devoted people wishing to read this, I include myself among this, why would you think that is? What aspects have helped?

HAP: I think that it definitely helps that paranormal romance is so popular right now. People are always looking, right now, for the next book they can really sink their teeth into (pun slightly intended) in the genre, but the typical stories about human-girl-meets-supernatural-boy are becoming overplayed in a lot of readers’ minds. I think that the idea that, while Lindy does meet a beautiful supernatural boy in Green, she’s more powerful than he is, appeals to readers who are frustrating with YA heroines who are little more than dishrags. That’s definitely not to say that’s the fate of all, or even most, YA heroines in the paranormal romance genre, but it is the trope that’s being bandied about the most in mainstream pop culture right now. I think, though, that paranormal romance — and YA in general — have the potential to give their audience protagonists who are hugely positive female role models and literary heroines who are entertaining in their own right.

BM: How long ago did you begin writing the book?

HAP: Well, like I said, I very originally started about seven years ago now, but the actual full text of Green was written in late 2008 and early 2009.

BM: Why do you think the few people who read your book at the July 2009 Focus Group identify themselves so much with Lindy?

HAP: Personally, I think — well, I hope — that it’s because Lindy is very much her own person. My goal was to make her relatable because of her uniqueness — I mean, how many people are actually the universe? — than to go the route of leaving her a blank canvas or vessel. Lindy has definite likes and dislikes, true friendships and friendships of convenience, and reacts to her explorations of the supernatural world in the way that I think I would… with wonder and wit, but also a small struggle to believe that everything is real.

BM: I understand the love story in Green between Lindy and Daniel is a driving force for the novel, was developing it hard?

HAP: Not at all! That was actually the easiest part of the novel for me. Again, I didn’t really sit down and decide that Daniel would exist, or be a werewolf, or love Lindy. He just is, and does. I really enjoy writing them together and I can’t even explain my excitement over people’s acceptance of their story.

BM: You started writing ever since you were three years old, why do you think you were so interested in the written word?

HAP: Probably because when you’re three and can write, it gets you a lot of attention! Plus, I had a really hard time as a child understanding that it wasn’t that my peers didn’t want to talk to me at two or three years old… it was that they didn’t know how!

My parents also made sure that books and reading were a huge part of our home. Every week my dad and I would walk to the library, which was in a white building with vines climbing up the walls, and I was allowed to check out as many books as I wanted. We read together every night, and for a long time, I felt a closer kinship to book characters than to other kids.

Until I was in third grade, I didn’t know that it would be possible for me to create characters. Sure, I sometimes wrote stories with little names that I liked taking the place of my own for the protagonists, but I didn’t really consider them characters — just fake versions of myself. I assumed that I had to write stories about the characters that greater minds had birthed — Gloria Gopher, Kirsten Larson, Karen Brewer, Jesse Bear — because the act of creating a whole new person (or anthropomorphic thing) seemed sacred and mystical. I wrote hundreds of stories in preschool, kindergarten, early elementary school, all using the characters that other people created, just because I legitimately believed that I was not worthy of such a thing. I was just a kid, I couldn’t make a person.

In third grade, my teacher finally told me that I couldn’t keep writing about other people’s characters because it was a breach of copywright.

I… was shocked.

Not only COULD I create characters… but I was SUPPOSED to invent these people for the stories in my mind? I could put names to the faces that crowded mental corners and give them likes and dislikes and backgrounds and histories and parents and siblings and favorite foods and enemies and quirks like preferring to wear socks with pom-poms (which one of my first independent characters did)?

It was, perhaps, the most profound epiphany I had ever had.

It may still be. It’s debatable.

At any rate, my writing career really started with, oh, seventeen years of writing fanfiction.

BM: When writing a story, what do you think is the most important aspect to have in mind? Complete Plot? Character development? Character relationships? Dialogue?

HAP: Character relationships, because otherwise, there’s no way to anchor the flow of the plot, the development of said characters, or the basis for the dialogue.

BM: If you could choose a character from a book to bring to life and speak to him/her, who would it be and why? It can be any character from any book ever written.

HAP: Ray Smith of The Dharma Bums by Jack Kerouac, because… he is Jack Kerouac. Anyone who thinks or speaks with the rambling beauty of Ray Smith/Jack Kerouac is someone who fascinates me.

BM: There are many people in my class that have never finished a book because they find no interest in them, what book would you recommending for young readers like them to become more fond of reading?

HAP: I will never not recommend Harry Potter. To anyone. For any reason. Platform 9-3/4 is where already more than one generation set out on their journey towards reading, and for very good reason. Harry Potter is the only book (series) I can think of that can appeal equally to children, teens, and adults; women and men; all races, religions, and nationalities. Every person wants to believe that one day, an owl will swoop in through their window and tell them that after everything else is said and done, they are special, because they are loved.

BM: Name your favorite art piece.

HAP: Michelangelo’s Pietà

BM: Name your favorite book.

HAP: Argh! WAY too many to name. See http://www.hayleyanneperkins.com/recommended.php and name any book there, and it has been my favorite at some point in my life.

BM: Name your favorite mythological creature.

HAP: Hmm. I don’t know if I can share without spoiling! I’m getting a little anxious trying to decide on one, because it feels unfair to the rest of my characters. Haha!

BM: Who is your favorite author? Does he or she inspire your writing in any way?

HAP: My two favorite authors are JK Rowling and Jack Kerouac, and they both inspire me hugely in different ways. JK Rowling is, to me, the epitome of “the author.” The difference in my mind between a writer and an author is the depth of the world they created, how much they respect that world, how much they respect our world, and how much they respect their readers, who bridge the two. JK Rowling’s Harry Potter universe is as multilayered and rich as our own, and she stays very consistent within it — she always has a clear and logical reason or history behind every decision that affects her characters within it. She also has shown so much social responsibility and understanding of her influence in “the real world,” and she never condescends to her readers, even when the series she never intended to be for children became popular with kids. She’s an amazing inspiration and to be like her will always be my ultimate, unattainable goal. When I lose faith in the world, I read Rowling. Jack Kerouac, in contrast, just reminds me every time I read him of how beautiful words can be. When I lose faith in words, I read Kerouac.

BM: Roberto Bolaño used to say that it is very important to write different stories at a time, would you agree with him or would you say that it is better to focus on just one story at a time?

HAP: I think that’s true, but there will always be the story that’s tied most into your soul and your bones and your heart that will bubble up to be the strongest and clearest and best. I worked on all four books in The Metempsyche Novels simultaneously, but focused the most on Green; now, I’m focusing the most on Red, but also working on the next two books, the short stories of the secondary characters, and a few other things.

BM: J.K Rowling, for example, wrote the epilogue for Harry Potter before starting the books, did you do something like that for The Metempsyche Novels or are you just letting it be?

HAP: I do know the epilogue, but I haven’t written it, just because I don’t want to jinx anything being cut by the publishers when it’s time for a final editing.

BM: When you write a book with this much magic and creatures, is it harder to write because you have to think of a deeper reason for everything or is it easier since you can practically do anything?

HAP: Oh… my… gosh, I have never researched anything in my life as much as I research every aspect of every particle of dust in the supernatural world of the Metempsyche novels. The mythos of every supernatural creature is very inspired by existing legend, available science, historical ideas… and of course, all of Lindy’s past lives are as historically accurate as I could make them. Writing this series is not exactly a Saturday afternoon frolic of the imagination, that’s for sure. In my opinion, reason is the difference between a good book and a great book (which is another lesson from JK Rowling!). The deeper you can get into the world of your characters, the more places they can lead you in developing their story, rather than you having to try to force along a plotline that is as thin as dental floss. If you really understand your characters and their environment, then their linear arc can split off into a great golden web like Priori Incantatem, and your work can feel round and complete. It’s the difference between a book you love and a book that changes the way you approach reading, writing, and seeing. The most successful stories know exactly why their mythologies function the way they do (even if it’s just convincing technobabble!). If you don’t know the parameters of your magical beings, they’ll stretch and stretch until suddenly things sparkle that probably shouldn’t. To break the rules, you need to know which directions they already bend.

BM: Who was the first person, apart from you, to read this book?

HAP: My friend Jacee and my editor Suzanne read it as I wrote, to keep me progressing forward instead of editing too much and impeding my own goals.

BM: Now for a typical question, what advice do you give young people that aspire to be writers some day?

HAP: Read. And write.

  • Share/Bookmark

December 31, 2009

Countdowns of 2009: The Best Blog/Diary/Journal Entries of the Decade

Let’s party like it’s ten years ago today!

My Favorite Blog/Diary/Journal Entries of the Decade

* Names have been changed to protect the not-so-innocent.

99% of these probably don’t make sense to anyone, even the other people who were there.  A few of them barely still make sense to me.  I think that’s the sign of a decade well-lived, don’t you?

June 12, 2000

(2009 Note: This is a clear example of why not to write comics with your friends, about your friends, that only your friends could understand.)

The Fighting Fitzpeople

July 4, 2001

The most EMBARRASSING thing that ever happened to me…..

THE MOST embarrassing thing that EVER happened to me was, well, see, one day, the clasp on my bra broke and so my mom brought me another one, and I put the broken bra into a bag in my binder.  2 Weeks later, Eugene stole the bag out of my binder and left it in the Spanish room.  Chris M. found it, waved it around, and Sra. L. HUNG IT IN THE DOORWAY w/ a sign that said “¿De quien es esta bra?”  So I made a sign the next day that said “Don’t go through others’ binders (Eugene!)” so Ann made a sign that said “Don’t leave your bra in the Spanish Room (HAYLEY!!!)”

December 26, 2002

Amy and my BRILLIANT theory to the world of Harry Potter… it was actually MY theory, but I’m letting her share the credit.

Our idea as to why Voldemort wanted to kill Harry and James Potter is as follows:

According to a theory on Mugglenet.com (and our own slightly slow common sense), Harry and James were both heirs to Gryffindor – they lived in Godric’s hollow, and Harry succeeded in pulling Gryffindor’s sword out of the Sorting Hat during his battle with the Basilisk, the monster of Slytherin. Voldemort, knowing this and being the heir to Slytherin, targeted them because he wanted to finish Salazar’s work and end the quibble that had arisen between the two Hogwarts founders.

To further confuse you, Neville is a parallel to Peter Pettigrew, as they both were tag-alongs to three more popular and powerful wizards in their year.

Ginny is a parallel to Lily, because they both have red hair and are at nature good people and physically beautiful.

Since Neville is a parallel to Pettigrew, and has shown interest in Ginny, who is in turn parallel to Lily, we think that Pettigrew was attracted to Lily.

Voldemort, knowing that Pettigrew had lusted for Lily, and had had his heart broken when James married her, got Pettigrew to unleash his hidden wrath towards James by betraying James and Harry’s whereabouts to Voldemort.

We know that Voldemort did not have any interest in murdering Lily until she got in the way of him killing Harry. He even told her, “Stand aside, silly girl!” Therefore, we know that he, being the heir of Slytherin, was only after the heirs of Gryffindor – James and Harry – and not Lily, who was just Lily.

So that is our theory as to why Voldemort wanted to murder Harry and James Potter.

teehee, gigglegiggle. bahahahahahahaa.

WE ARE BLOODY BRILLIANT!!!!!!

KTODSPAF,

<3Hayley

August 5, 2003

This was the best night of my life.

August 3, 2004

6 Girls
+ 7 Boys
+ 10,000 Marshmallows
+ 10 Sidewalk Chalks
+ 2 Cars
+ 1 Policeman
+ 1 Creepy Whisper
+ Midnight
__________________
One Crazy, Crazy Night

November 1, 2005

My new goal is to try and blog more like Meg Cabot, who somehow always has enough to say that it takes her a lot of words.

Sometimes, I am very daunted by words. I’m always afraid that somehow, I will run out of them, and then I won’t have anything to do with my life. I go to the library or a bookstore, and I see all of the books there, and I think…

Holy crap.  Look how many words have been used up.

It just doesn’t seem like there are that many more combinations of them that are possible.

And whenever I read something absolutely wonderful, like the ( tropopause monologue ) of Angels in America, I think, “That combination of words is so breathtaking… and no one can ever use it again and claim it their own. There are so few breathtaking combinations of words that can be mine.”

I get paranoid about everything I write after that, because a) WHAT IF I INADVERTANTLY COPIED SOMEONE ELSE’S ENTIRE BOOK? and b) WHAT IF SOMEONE ELSE PUBLISHES MY COMBINATIONS OF WORDS BEFORE I GET THE CHANCE TO, AND THEN NO ONE WILL BELIEVE THEY’RE MINE?

Then I hate words for a few minutes, and try to get by without them. But thinking without words is difficult sometimes, and if someone comes in, communicating without words can be awkward.

It is a dilemma.

August 25, 2006

Dear Veronica Mars,

I have been watching your show far too much on YouTube. Can you teach me how to solve mysteries? I lose stuff a lot.

Sincerely,
Hayley

December 25, 2007

Best. Christmas. Ever.

The moral of the story is, if you’re two years old and you get a Barbie fork stuck so far up your nose that X-rays can’t find it (and they try to drug-test your mother because it’s 1989 and you accidentally told them it was a spoon up your nose and they assume you got the idea from watching your mother snort blow, when really it was a fork all along and your mother did no such thing!) and you eventually sneeze it out all over your poor harassed mother at dinner and it almost breaks your neck because your dad is holding your head in place; and then you refuse to talk about it for almost a week before very seriously telling your father, “I did it because there was a booger I couldn’t reach”… then you’ll laugh about it until you’re bawling eighteen years later.

Not that I ever got a fork stuck up my nose when I was two.

My Barbies still aren’t allowed to eat dinner.

December 23, 2008

I saw the Rockefeller Center tree, and watched the skaters circle round and round the golden-lit rink.

I was ignored in Gucci (again) but didn’t have to suffer through being called fat by Swedish Prada models in Bergdorf’s (although yesterday, Lily Cole called me ‘quite cool’ and asked where was ‘the queue to the wash-up’).

FAO Schwartz’ giant stuffed animals were everything I ever hoped they would be.  There was a duo of siblings in matching Fair Isles Christmas sweaters jumping around on the giant piano, and they were precious.

AT FAO SCHWARTZ YOU CAN HAVE MADE YOUR OWN CUSTOM MUPPET.  If I am ever rich, I will have my own fleet of Muppets.  That is, now that I know it is possible, the epitome of all my life’s dreams.  Fleet of custom Muppets.

I had dessert at the Plaza.  It was so beautiful it was almost scary, and there is no portrait of Eloise on the wall anymore, just a case of 2004-rerelease Eloise memorabilia for sale in the side lobby.  The waitstaff all wear tuxedos with tails and have cufflinks.  Dessert was served with literal silver spoons, despite the fact that I clearly was not born with one in my mouth.  The chocolate pot de creme with chantilly cream and chocolate streusel was divine, and it was free, because a middle-aged Armenian man who was too mild-mannered to Richard-Gere-in-Pretty-Woman himself out more than to order us French fries surreptitiously, which he sent back when we didn’t want them, paid for it.

I used the strategy I learned for such occasions on Long Island: ”Thank you,” and leave immediately.

The lights on the ironwork were almost enough to make me wish I were rich enough or self-deprecating enough to stay at the Plaza for Christmas, though.

And if I did, I would completely pour a pitcher of water down the mail chute.

March 23, 2009
http://hayleyanneperkins.com/blog/?p=3

I’ve been trying to think of an appropriate way to christen my new blog as Hayley Anne Perkins, but my ideas always seem to fall short, at least in my own mind.  I’m very conscious of the implications of blogging to an audience that comprises more than just your best friends and your mom… I’m vaguely terrified of saying, or rather typing, just the wrong thing in just the wrong way and coming across as a terrible person.  Or at least as a person with an overinflated sense of self-importance, which is just as bad in a blogger.

So to break the ice: my ode to NYC Teen Author Festival 2009.

To preface this extremely bizarre gobbledygook — NYCTAF09 (I’m lazy and enjoy acronyms) was awesome.   I had an amazing time meeting all of the authors and several readers, and everyone was really nice and extraordinarily “chill” for it being an autograph signing… given my boy band expertise, I’m used to autograph signings involving at least three fainters and a tablejumper.  I was glad to see that everyone was patient and open to conversing with everyone else in line as they waited, and it was a treat to see the way that the writers complemented (and complimented!) each other.

While most people at the event today brought or bought stacks of books by their favorite writers, I brought the ultimate book: the Dictionary.

I asked every author to sign over their favorite word, and I promised to take the collection of Best Words and write a little mishmash of a piece.  Elise Broach said that I should try to get them all in order, and I seriously considered it until I started trying to decipher the autographs, and I realized that I was forgetting the order already.  Sigh.

The form was promised to Judy Blundell for her choice — “poem” — and the tone to Heather Duffy-Stone… “lusty”.  Unfortunately for all parties involved, poetry is the second-furthest thing from being my forte (with Math beating it easily).  Anyone I’ve ever dated can attest.  Therefore, given that this is not only a poem, but a poem using nonsense words, I hope no one takes it TOO seriously as a test of my writing ability!  Unless you love it, in which case, this is totally how I write…

You couldn’t see it, but my eyes got very shifty at that last sentence.

And I have to say, David Levithan saying that he was excited to read the finished endeavor pretty much killed me.  So here goes.

Ned Vizzini Stole My Pen
A Lusty Poem

Twin popes –
one pulchritudinous, the other feculant
in appearance –
both indefatigable in their vast perversity,
though incredulous of the idealism of the other:
one a bonvivant in deep meditation on generosity and grace,
the other in love with his epiphany on ecstasy,
sneaked into the basement of the church
ignoring the musical comedy rehearsal
upstairs.

One facetiously donned a crash
the other merely a lush apron
as they prepared to bake treats
for their family reunion
beneath the moon.

There could be no peace between these two brothers.
Discussion broke down in their unctuous disregard for each other
like a luffing sailboat’s disregard for the wind
when fighting its way through a sluice
(in simile, not metaphor);
Something was always wrong.

As delicious purple rhubarb dumplings
vied for space amongst the donuts
an ephemeral smoke began to rise:
almost magical in its majesty
And the brothers watched,
thunderstruck.

As they watched in wonder,
the metal of the pots against the stove –
fulminate metals –
began to coruscate,
shooting sparks into the air.

The pastries were ruined.
The brothers found between them a new sublimity:
they no longer had to bring dessert to the reunion
thanks to a force majeure.

LOVE – Nora Baskin
PURPLE - Jessica Blank
POEM - Judy Blundell
MEDITATION – Coe Booth
ECSTASY - Elise Broach
PEACE - Susane Colasanti
EPIPHANY (BUT NOT IN A RELIGIOUS SENSE)* – Sarah Darer-Littman
GRACE (NOT CHRISTIAN GRACE)* – Matt de la Pena
LUST – Heather Duffy-Stone
GENEROSITY – Gayle Forman
LUSH – Aimee Friedman
UNCTUOUS – Madeleine George
POPE – Maureen Johnson
TWIN – Kristen Kemp
PULCHRITUDINOUS – Justine Larbalestier
WONDER – David Levithan
DUMPLING – E. Lockhart
CORUSCATE – Barry Lyga
FAMILY – Carolyn Mackler
RHUBARB – Sarah MacLean
SUBLIME – Megan McCafferty
DELICIOUS - Lauren McLaughlin
LUSH - Neesha Meminger
SOMETHING (BECAUSE “SOMETHING IS GOOD”) – Billy Merrell
CRASH – Blake Nelson
BONVIVANT – Micol Ostow
INCREDULOUS - David Ozanich
EPHEMERAL (BUT ONLY FOR TODAY) – Matthue Roth
FORCE MAJEURE - Marie Rutkoski
SNEAK – Lisa Ann Sandell
FACETIOUS (BUT FOR REAL) – Courtney Sheinmel
DONUT (NOT DOUGHNUT) – Brian Sloan
IDEALISM - Jennifer Smith
PERVERSITY – Rachel Vail
INCREDULOUS – David Van Etten
LUFF – Ned Vizzini
SLUICE – Adrienne Maria Vrettos
INDEFATIGABLE - Cecily von Ziegesar
MOON - Melissa Walker
THUNDERSTRUCK - Lynn Weingarten
FECULANT - Scott Westerfeld
VAST - Suzanne Weyn
MUSICAL COMEDY - Maryrose Wood
METAPHOR – Lizabeth Zindel

FULMINATE” and “MAGICAL,” I am so sorry, but I can’t read your autographs or remember who wrote them… if it was you, please reclaim your Favorite Word in a comment!

  • Share/Bookmark

November 4, 2009

NaNoWriMo Support Blog for The Penultimate Page

Read the original posting at The Penultimate Page or the NaNo Support ning.  Thanks, Emilee!


It happens to everyone.

You sit down at your computer, pull up WikiPedia to fact-check your Norse mythology…

And three hours later, you’re totally enthralled reading about the varieties of Japanese Kit-Kat bars.

As a writer, this is a totally normal progression of thought.  Writers are naturally interested in… well, everything.  No matter what genre you write, to flesh out a story is to create the world in which your characters live – often from the ground up: Do they live in a city or a town?  Is it a real place?  What’s the weather like, and how does that affect what your characters wear and do and drive (or not)?

Whether writing high fantasy or realistic contemporary chick lit, research is an essential part of the storycrafting process.

Say that you want to write an urban fantasy that sets a mortal girl from 1966 Chicago against a backdrop of Greek gods and teenage titans who take over the Art Institute.

Only… you were born in 1990, live in a suburban area of Kansas City, and you know nothing about Greek mythology beyond what you saw in Disney’s Hercules when you were eight.  And it was so scary that you cried and had to leave the room halfway through the film.

What do you need to research first?  And more importantly, how do you research it?

My personal opinion is the setting.  The first, and most salient, question to ask when researching a new setting is to explore your own motivations: Why do you want to set your story in that place – and at that time?

Before I make my next overarching statement, I need to own up: I was a History major in college.  I find research to be unbelievably fun, especially when it’s focused on cultural aspects that inform and shape the lives of characters (or, er, people).  So my next overarching statement about the research process of fiction is: Time is a place.

So for our sample plot bunny, you would need to research both “1966” and “Chicago” in the same way.  People, and characters, are products of both nurture and nature, and the “wheres” and “whens” of their existence dramatically shape the “whos” and “whys.”

In other words, changing someone’s clothing doesn’t make them live in any certain time period any more than simply saying that they live in Chicago means that they’re Chicagoan.  Think about your own life, and all of the things your “wheres” and “whens” affect: not just your clothing, but the foods you eat and the stores in which you shop, the kind of car your parents drive and the type of house you live in.  What was the first political event you remember?  Who was the first person you knew to say a “bad word” and what did they say?  What did you do when you came home from school, and what was your first job – or what do you think it will be?

What are your neighbors like?

How did you learn about sex?

Do you have to wear a school uniform?

How has your taste in music changed over the years?

As instinctive as the answers to these questions are in your own life, your character is not you.  At least, I hope not.  And at least not more than 15% you, as most characters are in some way inextricably tied to their creators.  All the same, you need to be able to answer these questions as quickly, certainly, and accurately for your characters as you did for yourself.

A good jumping point to discern just what aspects of your characters’ “whens” and “wheres” will be most important is the 100 Questions About Your Character survey (originally developed by tabletop gamers, but co-opted by writers everywhere).  You can find a clean copy at http://storywrite.com/contest/6584.

So now you know what you need to know.  But how to go about acquiring that knowledge?

Well, in my humble opinion – and on pain of death to anyone reading this who shares this tidbit with any of my old History professors – WikiPedia is a great place to start for basic outlines of information.  The key is to explore the depths of the “References” and “External Links.”  It’s like an ultra-concentrated Google search that doesn’t torture you with Boolean specifics – you can already reasonably guess that if the References on a page about Neighborhoods of Chicago says that it’s leading you to Wicker Park, it really is.  Score one for Web 2.0!

Of course, the flip side to WikiPedia’s greatness (besides those temptations to play The WikiPedia Game or clicking links until you end up looking at Japanese confectionery) is its overreaching broadness.  Great, so you’ve found a page on Neighborhoods of Chicago and it has eighty-six bajillion References.  How the heck do you know where to go and how to find just what you need to enhance your story?

My knee-jerk reaction is to advise that you read everything you can get your grubby little paws (sorry; werewolves on the brain!) on in regards to the world where your characters live.  Even the smallest details — the coloring of a candy wrapper, whether a street runs North-South or East-West — can prove to be integral to the integrity of your work.  Maybe your MC needs to chase Artemis down Wacker Drive.  Without research, a tense scene of hide-and-seek in the construction of its extension to the Lake Shore could never come to fruition, and a part of your plot arc would be lost.  You just never know!

However, I realize that most people have neither time nor gumption to read the encyclopedia.  I blame my own habit on the year I was in sixth grade, when I was so bored with classes that I decided to memorize the Almanac pages that came in our Assignment Notebooks.  However, the deeper you can get into the world of your characters, the more places they can lead you in developing their story, rather than you having to try to force along a plotline that is as thin as dental floss.  If you really understand your characters and their environment, then their linear arc can split off into a great golden web like Priori Incantatem, and your work can feel round and complete.  It’s the difference between a book you love and a book that changes the way you approach reading, writing, and seeing.

So take notes!  Whether you take notes manually – a great way to imprint the information you’re reading digitally, so you can rely more on your mind and less on said notes – or by bookmarking relevant pages, make sure that your hard work isn’t flowing in one ear and out the other.  Make columns for “Who,” “What,” “When,” “Where,” “Why,” and “How,” or categorize with a timetable of your characters’ day (Wake, Dress, Eat, School?, Work?, Eat, Free Time?, Sleep) to make sure you cover all of your bases.

The same rule goes for researching your supernatural creatures.  It isn’t enough to know the bare bones of their legends, or the image of what you’re trying to create.  The most successful stories know exactly why their mythologies function the way they do (even if it’s just convincing technobabble!).  If you don’t know the parameters of your magical beings, they’ll stretch and stretch until suddenly things sparkle that probably shouldn’t.   To break the rules, you need to know which directions they already bend.

So what does any of that have to do with Kit-Kat bars?

I have no idea.

But that’s the fun of worldbuilding.  Every world needs candy.

Some of my favorite research links:

http://www.foodtimeline.org/

http://www.flickr.com/groups/theretrokid/pool/

http://miss-vintage.com/

http://solomon.bltc.alexanderstreet.com/

http://asp6new.alexanderstreet.com/was2/was2.index.map.aspx

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/

http://www.wikipedia.org

http://www.oxfordlanguagedictionaries.com/

http://online.sagepub.com/

http://www.tvparty.com/

http://www.retrojunk.com/

http://www.inthe80s.com/

http://www.inthe70s.com/

http://www.nytimes.com/

http://www.factmonster.com/spot/fashiontime1.html

http://www.ventrella.com/Ideas/grammar.html

  • Share/Bookmark

October 18, 2009

HAP Gets Interviewed!: ChickLitTeens for Jessica’s Birthday Extravaganza

Chick Lit Teens Interviews Hayley Anne Perkins

The ever-excellent Jessica of Chick Lit Teens interviewed me for her Birthday Extravaganza!  I’m really excited to have been her closing interview of the Extravaganza as well, and I’m grinning like a fool to be included in the company of Sarah MacLean, who I met at the Biggest Author Signing Ever; the incomparable Maggie Stiefvater (werewolf lovers represent!); and all of the others included!

You can read my interview on her site here or just keep scrolling…

Describe Green in five words or less.

Do the five words need to be a plot summary? I’m terrible at short plot summaries, but here’s a go: “Teenage universe explores her power.” If I can describe it in five adjectives, which would make me quite pleased, as I feel like that plot summary sounds a little like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles… and the book is not really all that like TMNT at all, despite both having Michelangelo in them…. I would describe Green as “Funny, sexy, philosophical, mythological mayhem.”

Which one of your characters do you relate to the most? Why?

I relate to all of them in some way, and it’s hard to answer this knowing that most people haven’t yet had a chance to read Green and meet the characters for themselves. I’m going to cop out a little bit and say that I think that I, like most people will, most relate to (MC) Lindy because there’s something very compellingly ordinary about her despite being embroiled in fantastical circumstances — but she’s actually a character who is delightfully ordinary, rather than being a blank-canvas vessel of clumsiness and blushing that somehow I’m supposed to find likable. Lindy has definite likes and dislikes, true friendships and friendships of convenience, and reacts to her explorations of the supernatural world in the way that I think I would… with wonder and wit, but also a small struggle to believe that everything is real.

Would you rather see your book as a TV show or a movie?

Well, at the moment, I’m still looking forward to seeing Green as a beautiful hardcover book, but in my daydreams I definitely see it as a movie. It sounds a leeeeetle bit conceited, but I don’t think that the plot would work well as a TV show, since it’s so multilayered and full. You’d really have to catch every episode for it to make any sense, and I’m not sure that forty-four minutes a week could really delve into the mythos of the Metempsyche universe if you also had to recap its inner workings for new viewers.

Who would be your dream cast?

It sounds totally cliche right now, but I would give just about anything to see Tom Sturridge play the part of Daniel, the romantic lead of the series. He’s a phenomenal actor who says so much in scenes of silence, and he’s got the closest “look” I’ve seen to how I imagine Daniel — a very delicate but strong face, very masculine but beautiful, and a little bit scary behind the eyes when he needs to be. He probably wouldn’t be interested in playing a werewolf, though, given what playing a vampire has done to his best friend, so I also like the idea of Avan Jogia, who is closer to the right age, I guess. But I’m a Tom girl at heart.

It’s harder for me to place a Lindy that I like, because I’m so protective of her. Kay Panabaker was suggested by one of my Focus Group readers, and she would be OK. The singer Savannah Outen looks similar to Lindy as well, in that they both have very big eyes and kind of round faces.

In terms of any other characters, I’m working on a collection of short stories of their narration that will come out one at a time leading up to the release of Green, so once you read those… you can let me know who you see as the characters! I’m not going to spoil everything all at once!

Outside of writing, what do you enjoy?

I watch a lot of television. I also really enjoy food and cooking, so I do that a lot. My original editor and I actually get together most Saturdays to cook together; it’s a LOT of fun. I also worked as a graphic designer for a long time, so I like making digital and multimedia art, but I can’t draw at all. AT ALL. Other than that, my day job takes up a lot of time and sends me on a lot of random business trips, so to get in my forty hours a week of writing on top of that, I don’t have a lot of time for much else these days.

What is your favorite adjective? Why?

It sounds facile, but I think my favorite adjective is “beautiful.” I like its ambiguity and the way it exudes a sort of quiet sigh of perfection.

If you could meet any author (past or present) who would it be?

Only one? I think by default I would need to say J.K. Rowling, because she’s influenced the way that I approach reading and writing more than any other writer. If she were to be unavailable, I’d want to meet Jack Kerouac, just to listen to him ramble for a while and how beautiful it would be.

What’s next for you?

Right now, working on getting the Metempsyche series on shelves for everyone to read and — hopefully — enjoy. Writing the collection of short stories starring that world’s secondary characters. Finishing up my website to make it full of fun and interesting Green and YA Lit things, and of course blogging pretty copiously, including the superfun Book Bloggers Get Blogged, featuring the lovely Chick Lit Teen herself, Jessica!

Happy Birthday Extravaganza, Jessica!

  • Share/Bookmark

Powered by WordPress